Sam Warburg vs Marsel Ilhan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Warburg vs Ilhan analysis and find out who is favored!
Sam Warburg vs Marsel Ilhan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Warburg 1 - 0 Ilhan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Warburg has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ilhan has won 49.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Warburg, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ilhan has won 55.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Warburg has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilhan has saved 53.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Warburg has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ilhan winning 63.89% (W/L 23/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Warburg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 127/ 82), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Ilhan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 303/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Warburg winning 1 times and Ilhan being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Warburg winning 2 and Ilhan winning 0. The last match between Warburg and Ilhan was at the Belgrade Challenger, 16-02-2009, First, Carpet with Sam Warburg getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Warburg and Ilhan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Warburg winning 0 times and Ilhan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Warburg winning 0, and Ilhan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Warburg has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ilhan has played against players with an average rank of 34.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Warburg has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilhan has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Warburg has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilhan has converted 44.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
6
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Ret.
Rank
132
High
41
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
877
Rank
77
High
36
Age
R
Plays
23
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
Form
58% (155-113)
Career Total W/L
59% (650-452)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
65% (15-8)
$87,365
Career Prize Money
$591,915
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sam Warburg | Marsel Ilhan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sam Warburg | Marsel Ilhan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (32/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (279/236) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.1 |
Aces Total | 0 | 24 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.09 |
DFs Total | 0 | 23 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:2:13 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (575/990) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (386/575) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (204/415) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (49/110) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (462/1068) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/23) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (14/12) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (14/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (9/3) |
Sam Warburg Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Michael Berrer
Player
Sam Warburg
66%
(
78 of
119)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
98)
3
Aces
15
8
Double Faults
3
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Scoville Jenkins
Player
Sam Warburg
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
20 of
23)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Marsel Ilhan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Gokberk Saritas
Player
Marsel Ilhan
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Lars Goran Verwerft
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Alper Okay Meryumoglu
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
S Mert Ozdemir
Player
Marsel Ilhan
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Marsel Ilhan
74%
(
68 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Gokberk Saritas
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Geni Inoue
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H |
view more